AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/308
1Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science & Technology, Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom.
2Numerical Department, St George's Technical Senior School, Basse, The Gambia.
3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Jos, Nigeria
4Department of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, University of Jos, Nigeria and National Blood Transfusion Service Agency, North Central Zonal Centre, Jos. Plateau State, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Moses Dabah Lugos, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”.
Citation: Moses D. Lugos, Joshua J. Wozoh, Ede E. Godwin, Dapus O. Damulak, (2026), Electronic Identification Systems in Transfusion Safety: A Narrative Review of Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness Evidence, Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, 15(1); DOI:10.31579/2693-4779/308
Copyright: © 2026, Moses Dabah Lugos. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 December 2025 | Accepted: 02 January 2026 | Published: 09 January 2026
Keywords: blood transfusion safety; electronic identification systems; barcoding; radiofrequency identification (rfid); cost effectiveness; patient safety; blood transfusion errors
Background: Transfusion safety is fundamental to patient care, yet misidentification and clerical errors persist as significant risks. Electronic identification systems, such as barcoding, radiofrequency identification (RFID), and integrated transfusion management platforms, have been adopted to enhance verification, traceability, and safety. While their clinical benefits are well documented, cost-effectiveness remains a crucial factor, particularly in resource-limited settings. This review examines the effectiveness of electronic identification systems in improving transfusion safety and evaluates their economic viability across various healthcare environments.
Methods: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed and Scopus, supplemented by reports from the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB). Publications from 2015 to 2025 were screened for relevance to transfusion safety, error reduction, patient outcomes, and economic evaluation. A narrative synthesis approach was used to integrate findings from both high-income and low-resource settings.
Results: Electronic identification systems consistently reduced the incidence of wrong-blood transfusions, near-miss events, and mislabelling errors. Barcoding improved bedside verification, while RFID enabled real-time tracking of blood products. Cost-effectiveness analyses demonstrated that, despite significant initial investment, long-term savings were achieved through fewer adverse events, reduced litigation costs, and enhanced workflow efficiency. Evidence from high-income countries supports widespread adoption, whereas studies in low- and middle-income settings highlight challenges related to infrastructure, training, and sustainability.
Conclusion: Electronic identification systems enhance transfusion safety and demonstrate favourable cost-effectiveness over time. Their integration into routine practice aligns with international recommendations for patient safety.
Clinical Significance: Electronic identification systems reduce preventable errors and increase efficiency, thereby strengthening patient safety and healthcare quality. Developing scalable and sustainable models for resource-limited settings is essential to ensure equitable access and maximise global impact.
Blood transfusion is a critical therapeutic intervention; however, it presents significant risks when patient identification and component matching are inadequately managed. Transfusion errors continue to be a major source of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide. Haemovigilance data from the UK’s Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) scheme reported nearly 1,000 “wrong blood in tube” (WBIT) incidents among 3,833 cases in 2023, highlighting the ongoing risk of misidentification despite established safety protocols [1]. Similar reports from Europe, North America, and Africa demonstrate that human error in identification processes remains a persistent challenge to transfusion safety [2].
Historically, transfusion safety depended on manual procedures, including double verification of patient identity, paper-based documentation, and staff vigilance. Although these measures reduced risks, they remained inherently susceptible to lapses in attention, communication failures, and clerical errors. The limitations of manual systems led to the development of more reliable, technology-driven solutions [3].
Electronic identification systems (EIS), including barcoding, radiofrequency identification (RFID), electronic cross-matching, and laboratory information systems (LIS), are now integral to modern transfusion practice. Barcoding systems, which link patient wristbands and blood unit labels to bedside scanners, have led to significant reductions in wrong-component transfusions [4]. RFID facilitates real-time tracking of blood products throughout the supply chain, thereby enhancing traceability and accountability [5]. Electronic cross-matching and LIS integration further improve assurance of compatibility and reduce laboratory turnaround times, representing a transition from reliance on human vigilance to system-based safeguards [6,7].
International guidelines strongly endorse these technologies. The World Health Organisation (WHO, 2024) recommends electronic verification as part of its global transfusion safety strategy. The Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB, 2025) identifies electronic patient identification and bedside verification as best practices within its standards. In the United Kingdom, NHS Blood and Transplant has introduced national programmes integrating barcoding and electronic transfusion management systems, resulting in measurable improvements in safety outcomes [8,9].
Despite well-documented benefits, adoption of these technologies remains inconsistent, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where infrastructure limitations and financial constraints impede widespread implementation [10,11]. Evaluation of both clinical effectiveness and economic feasibility is therefore essential. Although electronic systems require substantial initial investment in hardware, software, and staff training, evidence suggests that long-term cost savings are achievable through reductions in adverse events, litigation, and improved workflow efficiency [2,12]. In resource-limited settings, cost-effectiveness analyses are especially important for supporting adoption and ensuring sustainability.
This review synthesises the current evidence on electronic identification systems for transfusion safety, with particular emphasis on clinical and cost-effectiveness. By incorporating findings from both high-income and resource-limited settings, it seeks to provide a comprehensive perspective to inform policy, clinical practice, and future research.
2.1 Barcoding Systems
Barcoding is the most widely adopted electronic identification method in transfusion practice. Patient wristbands, blood unit labels, and bedside scanners encode unique, machine-readable identifiers, which reduce clerical errors associated with handwritten documentation. This system is cost-effective, compatible with existing hospital infrastructure, and has led to significant reductions in “wrong blood in tube” (WBIT) incidents [13]. However, barcoding requires line-of-sight scanning, and damaged or misprinted labels can compromise readability. The effectiveness of barcoding also depends on consistent staff compliance with scanning protocols [4].
2.2 Radiofrequency Identification (RFID)
Radiofrequency identification (RFID) technology enables real-time tracking of blood products through wireless transmission of product information. Each unit is tagged with a microchip that communicates with readers located in storage facilities, laboratories, and clinical areas. RFID provides continuous monitoring of product location and status, supporting vein-to-vein traceability and reducing the risk of misplacement or misidentification [14]. However, implementation of RFID is limited by high costs, infrastructure requirements, and potential interference in environments with multiple electronic signals.
2.3 Electronic Cross-Matching and Laboratory Information Systems (LIS)
Laboratory information systems (LIS) integrate patient serological history, current test results, and transfusion requests to authorise compatibility testing electronically. Electronic cross-matching eliminates the need for manual validation, reducing transcription errors and expediting turnaround times for urgent transfusions. LIS platforms also provide audit trails and support haemovigilance reporting [15]. Limitations include dependence on accurate initial patient identification, vulnerability to cybersecurity threats, and the need for robust IT support and regular system updates.
2.4 Integrated Electronic Transfusion Management Systems
Integrated transfusion management systems combine barcoding, RFID, LIS, and electronic prescribing within a unified platform. These systems provide comprehensive safety assurance by linking laboratory, clinical, and bedside data. They improve communication between teams, support real-time haemovigilance, and align with national reporting frameworks such as the United Kingdom’s Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) scheme [16]. Implementation is complex, requiring multidisciplinary coordination, substantial financial investment, and integration with legacy hospital IT systems.
2.5 Comparative Strengths and Limitations
| Barcoding | Low cost, widely adopted, and reduces clerical errors | Requires line‑of‑sight, label damage risk, and compliance dependent |
| RFID | Real-time tracking, vein-to-vein traceability, digital footprint | High cost, infrastructure needs, signal interference |
| LIS Cross‑Matching | Automated validation, audit trails, rapid turnaround | Dependent on accurate initial data, IT vulnerabilities |
| Integrated Systems | End-to-end safety, haemovigilance support, multidisciplinary linkage | Complex rollout, costly, integration challenges |
Table 1: Presents a comparative overview of the electronic identification systems discussed.
3.1 Reduction in Transfusion Errors
Data from the UK’s Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) scheme indicate that electronic identification systems significantly reduce wrong component transfusion (WCT) incidents and near-miss events. Hospitals implementing electronic systems reported substantially fewer errors compared to those using manual processes [17]. A 2025 study of NHS hospitals confirmed that electronic blood transfusion systems reduced mislabelling and wrong blood events, underscoring their role in preventing avoidable harm [2]. Case studies from Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals further demonstrated reductions in transfusion errors and increased productivity after the implementation of electronic systems [18].
3.2 Improvements in Traceability and Accountability
Electronic systems improve vein-to-vein traceability by digitally recording each stage from sample collection to bedside transfusion. RFID and barcoding technologies create audit trails that reinforce accountability and facilitate haemovigilance reporting [7,15]. In the UK, integration with national reporting frameworks such as SHOT has enhanced the accuracy of incident monitoring [4]. In the US and Europe, laboratory information system (LIS)-based solutions have similarly improved traceability, reduced administrative discrepancies, and supported compliance with regulatory standards.
3.3 Impact on Patient Outcomes
Although direct evidence connecting electronic systems to reduced mortality is limited, research demonstrates improvements in morbidity and hospital efficiency. Electronic transfusion systems decrease delays in blood delivery, shorten turnaround times, and minimise wastage [4]. These enhancements indirectly improve patient outcomes by enabling timely transfusions and reducing risks of misidentification. A 2025 BMJ commentary emphasised that widespread adoption of electronic blood management systems in the UK could further minimise patient harm and enhance safety [19].
3.4 Case Studies from High-Income Countries
3.5 Evidence from Low and Middle-Income Countries
Adoption of electronic transfusion systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains inconsistent. Pilot studies in Nigeria and South Africa indicate that barcoding and LIS systems can reduce mislabelling and enhance traceability, although infrastructure and cost remain significant barriers [22–24]. In India, RFID pilot projects in tertiary hospitals demonstrated improved tracking of blood products, but limited resources constrain scalability [25]. These findings illustrate the potential for electronic systems to improve transfusion safety globally, while emphasising the necessity for context-specific implementation strategies.
3.6 Challenges in Measuring Effectiveness
4.1 Direct costs: purchase, implementation, training, maintenance
Electronic transfusion systems require upfront capital for hardware (e.g., scanners, RFID readers, blood fridge interfaces), software licences, and integration with existing hospital IT, as well as ongoing maintenance and support contracts. Implementation typically requires project management, configuration to local workflows, and comprehensive staff training across laboratory and clinical teams, which contributes to initial and recurrent costs [26]. UK experience indicates that staged deployment and leveraging existing infrastructure (e.g., bedside devices and LIS) can mitigate capital outlay, though full integration remains resource-intensive [27] . Maintenance costs include hardware replacement cycles, software updates, and cybersecurity measures to ensure system resilience [23].
4.2 Indirect costs: workflow changes, staff time, IT infrastructure
In addition to procurement costs, indirect costs include workflow redesign, temporary productivity reductions during system adoption, and increased demands on IT infrastructure, such as networking, authentication, and device management. Multi-site case studies demonstrate that achieving consistent scanning compliance and reliable connectivity requires ongoing process refinement and sustained change management, both of which require significant time investment from clinical and laboratory staff [28]. Reports from NHS hospital implementations indicate that integrating blood stock systems, bedside checking, and electronic requesting can streamline workflows after the initial transition, provided there is sufficient IT capacity and user support to prevent bottlenecks [2].
4.3 Economic benefits: avoided adverse events, reduced litigation, improved efficiency
Economic benefits result from preventing wrong-component transfusion (WCT) events and near-miss events, as well as from reductions in rework, wasted blood components, and subsequent harm. SHOT analyses associate electronic identification with a decrease in WCTs, suggesting cost avoidance related to incident investigations, additional patient care, and potential litigation [4]. UK commentary contends that system-level advantages, such as enhanced safety and improved traceability, justify investment by reducing preventable harm and inefficiency on a national scale [19]. Implementation reports from NHS sites highlight improvements in stock visibility and turnaround time, reducing waste and delays and potentially yielding savings in blood utilisation and operational efficiency [2].
4.4 Cost-effectiveness analyses from different healthcare settings
Recent UK health-economic evaluations examine the impact and cost-effectiveness of electronic blood transfusion systems (EBS, EBO, EBF, and traceability platforms), with a focus on stock management, wastage reduction, and service efficiency in NHS hospitals [2]. Comparative analyses from international sites indicate that baseline error rates, local pricing structures, and the maturity of system integration influence cost-effectiveness. Greater benefits are observed where systems are consistently implemented at the bedside and closely integrated with LIS and prescribing systems [23]. These results suggest that institutions with higher pre-implementation error rates or fragmented processes may achieve greater net savings following adoption [29].
4.5 Modelling studies comparing barcoding versus RFID
Both conceptual and applied models generally identify barcoding as the lower-cost option that delivers significant safety improvements. In contrast, RFID provides additional benefits, such as real-time location tracking, automated temperature and chain-of-custody logging, and inventory optimisation, but at a higher capital and integration cost. NHS implementation reports highlight that barcode-based bedside checks substantially reduce identification errors at a relatively modest price. At the same time, the added value of RFID is most pronounced in high-volume centres that prioritise logistics and traceability at scale [2]. International case studies indicate that the cost-effectiveness of RFID depends on the extent to which savings from reduced wastage, search time, and logistics incidents are realised, which varies by context [23].
| Barcoding | Low–moderate | Low–moderate | Avoided WCT/near misses; efficient bedside checks | Broad adoption, most hospitals |
| RFID | Moderate–high | Moderate–high | Inventory optimisation;chain of custody; reduced wastage/search time | High volume, logistics-focused centres |
Table 2: Comparative cost Levels and Value Drivers of Barcoding and RFID Systems in Transfusion Safety.
Sources: [2]
4.6 Considerations for resource-limited settings: affordability and sustainability
In resource-constrained settings, cost-effective barcoding integrated with a LIS typically offers the greatest return, due to lower capital requirements and simpler maintenance than RFID. International case studies emphasise the value of phased implementation, local device support, and comprehensive training to maintain compliance and reliability [23]. UK experience further demonstrates that focusing on bedside verification and comprehensive traceability delivers significant safety and efficiency improvements, providing a practical approach for lower-resource environments to achieve cost-effective gains without the need for complete RFID infrastructure [19].
5.1 Technical barriers: interoperability, infrastructure, and power reliability
Interoperability among bedside systems, laboratory information systems (LIS), electronic prescribing platforms, and enterprise electronic health records remains a persistent challenge, revealing deficiencies in standards, messaging protocols, and device integration. Hospitals frequently encounter obstacles in aligning vendor ecosystems, maintaining reliable network connectivity across wards, and managing large-scale device inventories, including scanners, readers, and workstations. Power reliability and environmental factors, including shielding requirements and electromagnetic interference for RFID, as well as line-of-sight limitations for barcode scanners, further complicate implementation, especially in older facilities and multi-site organisations [23]. Successful integration of transfusion platforms with national frameworks and local governance necessitates phased configuration, comprehensive testing, and continuous technical support to ensure sustained performance and safety [15].
5.2 Human factors: staff training, change resistance, and compliance
Even technically straightforward safety measures, such as bedside barcode scanning, encounter behavioural barriers including inconsistent compliance, workarounds due to time constraints, and variability in training quality. UK haemovigilance data consistently identifies “wrong blood in tube” near-misses as the most frequent category of reports, highlighting the importance of accurate identification and strict adherence to electronic verification protocols. Practical implementations prioritise structured training, human-centred workflow design, visible leadership support, and feedback mechanisms to maintain compliance under operational pressures [4,19]. Multi-site case studies underscore the necessity of co-design with end-users and iterative process improvement to integrate scanning and documentation into routine practice reliably [23].
5.3 Organisational barriers: funding, policy alignment, and leadership commitment
Obtaining both capital and ongoing funding for hardware, software, integration, and support contracts presents a significant barrier, particularly when benefits are distributed across multiple departments rather than a single budget holder. National strategies emphasise the necessity of policy endorsement, robust governance, and cross-organisational coordination to standardise practices and facilitate adoption. Strong executive sponsorship, well-defined accountability, and alignment with transfusion committees and regulatory requirements are consistently identified as key factors for successful implementation and sustainability [15]. International case studies demonstrate that active leadership engagement and explicit prioritisation of patient identification safety are associated with broader adoption and more consistent bedside use [23].
5.4 Ethical and legal considerations: privacy and data security
Electronic transfusion systems handle sensitive patient identifiers and clinical information, requiring comprehensive data protection measures, stringent access controls, audit trails, and a strong cybersecurity framework. Integration across laboratory, ward, and national reporting systems increases both the potential attack surface and regulatory compliance requirements. Implementers highlight the necessity for role-based access, secure authentication, encryption of data both at rest and in transit, and robust incident response protocols, in addition to clear policies for data retention and secondary use. Governance structures aligned with national transfusion strategies and haemovigilance programs facilitate lawful data processing while maintaining the traceability essential for safety monitoring [15,23].
5.5 Lessons learned from successful implementations
Co-design and phased deployment: Early engagement of clinical and laboratory end-users, along with iterative workflow development prior to scaling, is essential. Implementing a phased roll-out with defined milestones minimises disruption and fosters the development of local champions [23].
The literature consistently demonstrates that technical readiness, human-centred implementation, and organisational commitment must progress in tandem to achieve the safety benefits associated with electronic identification in transfusion practice.
6.1 Adoption across regions: Europe, North America, Africa, and Asia
Electronic identification system adoption is most advanced in Europe and North America, where barcode-based bedside verification, laboratory information system (LIS) integration, and, in some centres, RFID-enabled traceability are established within large hospital networks. UK implementation studies report widespread deployment of electronic blood transfusion systems across NHS hospitals, featuring robust LIS integration and standardised barcode-based bedside verification; select sites have piloted RFID for inventory and location tracking [15]. In North America, AABB standards formalise electronic identification in pretransfusion processes, allowing validated electronic systems to replace a second sample under strict criteria [1,30]. In Africa and parts of Asia, adoption is variable: tertiary centres are increasingly implementing LIS and barcoding, but national-scale rollouts are limited by infrastructure, funding, and interoperability challenges. Analyses focused on Nigeria highlight the need for nationally enhanced digital health capacity and policy support to expand the adoption of transfusion informatics [22,31]. Broader digital health reviews in sub‑Saharan Africa identify similar barriers, including connectivity, workforce limitations, and policy misalignment, which directly affect transfusion informatics programmes [32].
6.2 International recommendations: WHO, ISBT, and AABB
International organisations consistently recommend robust patient identification and electronic traceability as essential safety practices. AABB Standards specify that validated electronic identification systems can fulfil the “two determinations” requirement for ABO grouping, underscoring their importance in preventing errors during pretransfusion testing [15,30]. The ISBT Resource Library compiles global guidance and WHO documents relevant to blood establishments and patient blood management, demonstrating consensus on electronic processes that enhance traceability, auditability, and haemovigilance [15,33]. UK Transfusion Guidelines explicitly endorse printed wristbands and barcode-enabled electronic checks throughout the transfusion pathway, including sampling, laboratory receipt, issue, and bedside administration, thereby establishing transparent interoperability and compliance expectations among clinical teams [4,34,35].
6.3 National programmes and case examples
The United Kingdom has advanced through coordinated national initiatives that integrate standards, training, and haemovigilance. NHS Blood and Transplant deliver infrastructure, training resources, and data programmes, such as the Blood Stocks Management Scheme, which support large-scale deployment. Hospitals implement LIS-linked bedside systems with barcode verification [4,34]. Studies from NHS hospitals indicate that integrated electronic transfusion systems enhance traceability and reduce identification errors when consistently applied at the bedside, with governance and local leadership providing critical support [36]. Haemovigilance commentaries in BMJ emphasise the necessity of accurate patient identification and advocate for widespread adoption of electronic blood management systems to address frequent near-miss “wrong blood in tube” events reported annually to SHOT [37]. SHOT analyses directly link electronic identification to a reduction in wrong-component transfusion incidents, reinforcing the value of these programmes at the national level [38].
6.4 Relevance for Nigeria and other sub‑Saharan African countries
In Nigeria, policy analyses and clinical commentaries underscore the urgent need to enhance transfusion safety and demonstrate the feasibility of improving identification and traceability through LIS and barcode implementation in tertiary centres. However, persistent challenges remain in infrastructure, workforce training, and governance [22,31]. Systematic reviews of digital health adoption across sub‑Saharan Africa identify pervasive obstacles, including interoperability, network reliability, power supply, and funding, which significantly impact transfusion informatics programmes. Targeted investments and phased implementation strategies are recommended to develop sustainable capacity [32]. Lessons from UK programmes, such as standardised workflows, e-learning, and governance via national transfusion committees, are adaptable to African contexts. Emphasis should be placed on affordable barcoding integrated with LIS prior to introducing advanced RFID, in alignment with local power and connectivity constraints [4,30].
6.5 Key lessons for global scale‑up
* Standardise workflows and data: International guidance (AABB, ISBT, WHO) supports harmonised identification steps and validated electronic processes; alignment with these standards eases interoperability and accreditation [15,33] .
* Prioritise bedside compliance: Evidence from UK implementations shows consistent barcode scanning at the bedside is pivotal to real‑world safety gains and incident reduction [4,15,34].
* Build capacity incrementally: In resource‑limited settings, LIS plus barcoding offers high value; phased deployment with training and governance mitigates infrastructure constraints observed across sub‑Saharan Africa [31,32].
*Leverage national bodies: Central support (e.g., NHSBT) for training, data, and haemovigilance accelerates adoption and quality improvement; similar structures can catalyse progress in other regions [4,34].
Adoption patterns correspond to the maturity of health systems and the strength of governance. Regions with established standards, LIS infrastructure, and consistent bedside compliance achieve greater integration and measurable safety improvements. In contrast, resource-limited settings benefit from phased, standards-based approaches that prioritise affordability and long-term sustainability.
7.1 Integration with artificial intelligence and machine learning for predictive safety
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly utilised to improve transfusion safety. Predictive algorithms can identify patients at higher risk of transfusion reactions, detect potential mismatches, and optimise blood inventory management. Recent reviews suggest that ML models trained on transfusion datasets can predict adverse events and enhance decision support in transfusion practice [39]. Cancelas et al. [40] highlight the significance of AI in clinical transfusion decision-making, while Maynard et al.[39] show that ML applications reduce clerical errors and improve haemovigilance reporting. AI-driven dashboards integrated with laboratory information systems (LIS) can provide real-time alerts, which reduce reliance on manual checks and increase patient safety [41].
7.2 Blockchain for secure transfusion records
Blockchain technology offers decentralised, tamper-proof record keeping with significant potential to enhance transfusion traceability. Recent pilot studies in healthcare data management demonstrate blockchain’s ability to secure transfusion records, promote transparency, and enable cross-institutional data sharing [42,43]. By creating immutable records of blood product movement and patient transfusion history, blockchain can improve haemovigilance and mitigate risks of fraud or misreporting [44]. However, challenges concerning scalability, interoperability, and regulatory acceptance remain [45].
7.3 Mobile health applications for bedside verification
Mobile health (mHealth) applications are currently being evaluated for bedside transfusion verification, employing smartphones and tablets to scan barcodes or RFID tags. These applications integrate with laboratory information systems (LIS) and electronic prescribing systems, which allows clinicians to confirm patient identity and product compatibility in real time [46]. Initial studies in Indian tertiary hospitals indicate improved compliance and reduced near-miss events [23]. Bolton Maggs (2025) provides further evidence of the feasibility of smartphone-based barcode scanning to enhance bedside transfusion safety, though challenges related to device management, connectivity, and cybersecurity persist [1]. In resource-limited environments, mobile solutions may offer a cost-effective alternative to dedicated bedside scanners [2].
7.4 Potential for global harmonisation of transfusion safety standards
International organisations, such as the World Health Organisation (WHO), International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT), and AABB, advocate for harmonised standards in patient identification and transfusion traceability [33,47]. Achieving global harmonisation would enhance interoperability, facilitate cross-border data sharing, and strengthen international haemovigilance efforts [47]. The UK’s Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) scheme and NHS Blood and Transplant programmes exemplify national coordination models that could inform the development of global frameworks [1]. However, harmonisation initiatives must balance the need for standardisation with sufficient flexibility to accommodate variations in local infrastructure and resource availability [33,47].
7.5 Research gaps: long-term cost effectiveness and scalability in low-resource settings
Although current evidence is promising, significant research gaps remain. Few long-term cost-effectiveness studies have assessed the economic impact of electronic transfusion systems across extended periods and varied healthcare settings [2,19]. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), scalability is constrained by infrastructure, financial resources, and workforce training [11]. Pilot studies conducted in Nigeria, South Africa, and India confirm feasibility but also reveal persistent sustainability challenges [11,22]. Future investigations should focus on pragmatic trials, economic modelling, and implementation science to guide adoption in resource-limited environments [48,49].
Electronic identification systems, including barcoding, RFID, LIS-based cross-matching, and integrated transfusion management platforms, have consistently demonstrated improvements in transfusion safety across diverse healthcare settings. Evidence from haemovigilance programmes, such as the UK’s Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) scheme, confirms that these technologies reduce wrong-component transfusion (WCT) incidents, mislabelling, and near-miss events, thereby strengthening patient safety and accountability [1]. Implementation studies in NHS hospitals further show that electronic transfusion systems improve traceability, reduce wastage, and enhance operational efficiency, supporting their cost effectiveness in high-income settings [1]
Despite these successes, the literature highlights the necessity of context-specific implementation strategies. Technical barriers, such as interoperability and infrastructure limitations, and human factors, such as staff training and compliance, require tailored approaches to achieve sustainable adoption. Experiences from successful national programmes, such as NHS Blood and Transplant in the UK, underscore the importance of leadership, governance, and phased deployment in integrating electronic systems into routine practice [19].
In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), pilot studies in Nigeria, South Africa, and India demonstrate the feasibility of barcoding, LIS, and RFID systems. However, scalability is limited by resource constraints, infrastructure challenges, and workforce training needs [50,51]. These findings highlight the urgent need for further research on long-term cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and scalability in resource-limited settings. Pragmatic trials, economic modelling, and implementation science approaches are essential to inform adoption strategies that balance affordability and safety.
From a policy perspective, global harmonisation of transfusion safety standards, as advocated by the World Health Organisation (WHO), International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT), and AABB, provides a foundation for interoperability, cross-border data sharing, and enhanced haemovigilance. National health systems should prioritise investment in electronic identification technologies, recognising their dual role in improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs by preventing adverse events and litigation.
In summary, electronic identification systems are fundamental to modern transfusion safety. Their demonstrated effectiveness and cost-efficiency in multiple settings support continued expansion. However, success will require context-specific strategies, ongoing policy support, and targeted research to achieve equitable adoption globally.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. The peer review process of the journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions was excellent and fast, as was the support of the editorial office and the quality of the journal. Kind regards Walter F. Riesen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Walter F. Riesen.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. Thank you for publishing our article, Exploring Clozapine's Efficacy in Managing Aggression: A Multiple Single-Case Study in Forensic Psychiatry in the international journal of clinical case reports and reviews. We found the peer review process very professional and efficient. The comments were constructive, and the whole process was efficient. On behalf of the co-authors, I would like to thank you for publishing this article. With regards, Dr. Jelle R. Lettinga.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, I would like to express my deep admiration for the exceptional professionalism demonstrated by your journal. I am thoroughly impressed by the speed of the editorial process, the substantive and insightful reviews, and the meticulous preparation of the manuscript for publication. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the courteous and immediate responses from your editorial office to all my inquiries. Best Regards, Dariusz Ziora
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation, Auctores Publishing LLC, We would like to thank the editorial team for the smooth and high-quality communication leading up to the publication of our article in the Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. The reviewers have extensive knowledge in the field, and their relevant questions helped to add value to our publication. Kind regards, Dr. Ravi Shrivastava.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, Auctores Publishing LLC, USA Office: +1-(302)-520-2644. I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the efficient and professional handling of my case report by the ‘Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies’. The peer review process was not only fast but also highly constructive—the reviewers’ comments were clear, relevant, and greatly helped me improve the quality and clarity of my manuscript. I also received excellent support from the editorial office throughout the process. Communication was smooth and timely, and I felt well guided at every stage, from submission to publication. The overall quality and rigor of the journal are truly commendable. I am pleased to have published my work with Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, and I look forward to future opportunities for collaboration. Sincerely, Aline Tollet, UCLouvain.
Dear Ms. Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. “The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews represented the “ideal house” to share with the research community a first experience with the use of the Simeox device for speech rehabilitation. High scientific reputation and attractive website communication were first determinants for the selection of this Journal, and the following submission process exceeded expectations: fast but highly professional peer review, great support by the editorial office, elegant graphic layout. Exactly what a dynamic research team - also composed by allied professionals - needs!" From, Chiara Beccaluva, PT - Italy.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, we have deeply appreciated the professionalism demonstrated by the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The reviewers have extensive knowledge of our field and have been very efficient and fast in supporting the process. I am really looking forward to further collaboration. Thanks. Best regards, Dr. Claudio Ligresti
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. “The peer review process was efficient and constructive, and the editorial office provided excellent communication and support throughout. The journal ensures scientific rigor and high editorial standards, while also offering a smooth and timely publication process. We sincerely appreciate the work of the editorial team in facilitating the dissemination of innovative approaches such as the Bonori Method.” Best regards, Dr. Matteo Bonori.
I recommend without hesitation submitting relevant papers on medical decision making to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I am very grateful to the editorial staff. Maria Emerson was a pleasure to communicate with. The time from submission to publication was an extremely short 3 weeks. The editorial staff submitted the paper to three reviewers. Two of the reviewers commented positively on the value of publishing the paper. The editorial staff quickly recognized the third reviewer’s comments as an unjust attempt to reject the paper. I revised the paper as recommended by the first two reviewers.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Thank you for publishing our case report: "Clinical Case of Effective Fetal Stem Cells Treatment in a Patient with Autism Spectrum Disorder" within the "Journal of Clinical Research and Reports" being submitted by the team of EmCell doctors from Kyiv, Ukraine. We much appreciate a professional and transparent peer-review process from Auctores. All research Doctors are so grateful to your Editorial Office and Auctores Publishing support! I amiably wish our article publication maintained a top quality of your International Scientific Journal. My best wishes for a prosperity of the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Hope our scientific relationship and cooperation will remain long lasting. Thank you very much indeed. Kind regards, Dr. Andriy Sinelnyk Cell Therapy Center EmCell
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. It was truly a rewarding experience to work with the journal “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. The peer review process was insightful and encouraging, helping us refine our work to a higher standard. The editorial office offered exceptional support with prompt and thoughtful communication. I highly value the journal’s role in promoting scientific advancement and am honored to be part of it. Best regards, Meng-Jou Lee, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital.
Dear Editorial Team, Journal-Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, “Publishing my article with Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions has been a highly positive experience. The peer-review process was rigorous yet supportive, offering valuable feedback that strengthened my work. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional professionalism, prompt communication, and a genuine commitment to maintaining the highest scientific standards. I am very pleased with the publication quality and proud to be associated with such a reputable journal.” Warm regards, Dr. Mahmoud Kamal Moustafa Ahmed
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews’, I appreciate the opportunity to publish my article with your journal. The editorial office provided clear communication during the submission and review process, and I found the overall experience professional and constructive. Best regards, Elena Salvatore.
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews Herewith I confirm an optimal peer review process and a great support of the editorial office of the present journal
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. I am really grateful for the peers review; their feedback gave me the opportunity to reflect on the message and impact of my work and to ameliorate the article. The editors did a great job in addition by encouraging me to continue with the process of publishing.
Dear Cecilia Lilly, Editorial Coordinator, Endocrinology and Disorders, Thank you so much for your quick response regarding reviewing and all process till publishing our manuscript entitled: Prevalence of Pre-Diabetes and its Associated Risk Factors Among Nile College Students, Sudan. Best regards, Dr Mamoun Magzoub.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is a high quality journal that has a clear and concise submission process. The peer review process was comprehensive and constructive. Support from the editorial office was excellent, since the administrative staff were responsive. The journal provides a fast and timely publication timeline.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, What distinguishes International Journal of Clinical Case Report and Review is not only the scientific rigor of its publications, but the intellectual climate in which research is evaluated. The submission process is refreshingly free of unnecessary formal barriers and bureaucratic rituals that often complicate academic publishing without adding real value. The peer-review system is demanding yet constructive, guided by genuine scientific dialogue rather than hierarchical or authoritarian attitudes. Reviewers act as collaborators in improving the manuscript, not as gatekeepers imposing arbitrary standards. This journal offers a rare balance: high methodological standards combined with a respectful, transparent, and supportive editorial approach. In an era where publishing can feel more burdensome than research itself, this platform restores the original purpose of peer review — to refine ideas, not to obstruct them Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi, FCCP PULMONOLOGIST AND THORACIC IMAGING.
Dear Grace Pierce, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews I appreciate the opportunity to review for Auctore Journal, as the overall editorial process was smooth, transparent and professionally managed. This journal maintains high scientific standards and ensures timely communications with authors, which is truly commendable. I would like to express my special thanks to editor Grace Pierce for his constant guidance, promt responses, and supportive coordination throughout the review process. I am also greatful to Eleanor Bailey from the finance department for her clear communication and efficient handling of all administrative matters. Overall, my experience with Auctore Journal has been highly positive and rewarding. Best regards, Sabita sinha
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of the journal IJCCR, I write here a little on my experience as an author submitting to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews (IJCCR). This was my first submission to IJCCR and my manuscript was inherently an outsider’s effort. It attempted to broadly identify and then make some sense of life’s under-appreciated mysteries. I initially had responded to a request for possible submissions. I then contacted IJCCR with a tentative topic for a manuscript. They quickly got back with an approval for the submission, but with a particular requirement that it be medically relevant. I then put together a manuscript and submitted it. After the usual back-and-forth over forms and formality, the manuscript was sent off for reviews. Within 2 weeks I got back 4 reviews which were both helpful and also surprising. Surprising in that the topic was somewhat foreign to medical literature. My subsequent updates in response to the reviewer comments went smoothly and in short order I had a series of proofs to evaluate. All in all, the whole publication process seemed outstanding. It was both helpful in terms of the paper’s content and also in terms of its efficient and friendly communications. Thank you all very much. Sincerely, Ted Christopher, Rochester, NY.
