AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/359
1PhD in Psychology American University Kyiv.
2Professor of the Department of Military Psychology Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor National Defence University of Ukraine.
3PhD student of the Department of Military Psychology, National Defence University of Ukraine.
4PhD student of the Department of Military Psychology, National Defence University of Ukraine.
5Military student of the Institute of Strategic Communications, National Defence University of Ukraine.
*Corresponding Author: Vladyslav Klochkov, PhD in Psychology American University Kyiv.
Citation: Vladyslav Klochkov, Vasyl Stasiuk, Vasyl Ukrainets, Artem Filippskyi, Fedorenko Yuliia, (2026), Analysis of the Psychological Features of Stress Resistance of Servicemen of Mechanized Units in Conditions of Defensive Combat, Psychology and Mental Health Care, 10(1): DOI:10.31579/2637-8892/359
Copyright: © 2026, Vladyslav Klochkov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 01 January 2026 | Accepted: 16 January 2026 | Published: 23 January 2026
Keywords: serviceman; combat operations; defensive combat; stressors; stress tolerance; coping strategies; motivation; emotions; intelligence
The article presents an empirical analysis of the psychological features of stress resistance of servicemen of mechanized units in the conditions of maintaining defensive combat. The investigation was conducted within the structural components of stress resistance (motivational-value, cognitive-intellectual, emotional-volitional, and behavioral) using pre-selected, valid, and reliable psychometric instruments. Study found that the activities of servicemen of mechanized units in defensive combat depend on a number of features determined by the internal nature of stress resistance. Within the motivational-value component, the leading place is occupied by the system of values and motives, awareness of the purpose and meaning of defensive combat operations, which directly influence the behavior of a serviceman in a combat situation, determine and regulate it. The role of the cognitive-intellectual component depends on the intellectual potential of the military serviceman’s personality, in particular his cognitive flexibility, analytical thinking, ability to analyze information and establish cause-and-effect relationships, and make well-founded and considered decisions. The essence of the emotional-volitional component of stress resistance is based on the ability to identify, control, and express one's own emotions. It has been found that an important component of such a process is overcoming uncertainty, situational anxiety, and the formation of stable emotional-volitional self-regulation. Within the behavioral component, the active and effective activity of military personnel in combat is based on the objective ability to analyze the situation, plan, and choose constructive coping strategies. This approach involves taking into account the individual psychological properties of a serviceman's personality, his thinking style, values, motives, and other psychological resources that ensure consistent problem solving in the conditions of maintaining a defensive battle.
In the context of large-scale armed aggression unleashed by russia against Ukraine, studying the stress resistance of servicemen in mechanized units is a prerequisite for their effective action in defensive combat. First and foremost, this is due to the rapid development of forms, methods, and technologies of warfare, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) and other weapons, including the use of artificial intelligence. The constant threat from the air and limited physical protection options significantly affect the mental state of military personnel, causing chronic stress and potentially leading to post-traumatic stress disorder. Under such conditions, the successful adaptation of military personnel to the stress factors of combat depends on a high level of stress resistance, which can be achieved on the basis of theoretical and empirical analysis of its psychological features.
Theoretical foundations
In contemporary foreign and domestic psychological literature, a sufficient number of theoretical and empirical studies are devoted to the issue of systematic analysis of psychological features of stress resistance. Among the main ones are the works of M. Bilova, G. Dubchak, N. Endler, O. Kogut, V. Korolchuk, R. Lazarus, J. Parker, Y. Teptiuk, S. Folkman, N. Yurieva, and others. At the same time, each psychological research has its own methodological specificity and focuses on a specific type of activity.
Methodology
To achieve the goal, we have used empirical (observation, conversation, survey, experiment, generalization of experience) and statistical research methods (Pearson's correlation coefficient r). The set of research methods we have used made it possible to obtain scientifically sound quantitative and qualitative data on the level of development of the structural components of stress resistance, identify the dominant and weak mechanisms for overcoming the stress factors of combat, and track the relationships between stress resistance and a number of individual psychological characteristics of servicemen.
The results of previous theoretical studies have shown that the effective activity of military personnel in defensive combat is determined by their high level of stress resistance to the negative factors of the combat environment [7]. To gain a deeper understanding of the mental states of military personnel and determine their ability to act effectively in conditions of increased danger, emotional tension, and uncertainty, we conducted an empirical study and analyzed the psychological characteristics of stress resistance of military personnel of mechanized units in conditions of defensive combat. The research was conducted on the basis of mechanized units of the Ground Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, with 232 servicemen participating: 12 officers, 56 sergeants, and 164 soldiers. For this purpose, a set of psychodiagnostic techniques was used to study stress resistance as a systemic, integrative, and holistic property of a serviceman's personality. To this end, a set of psychodiagnostic techniques was used to study stress resistance as a systemic, integrative, and holistic property of a military serviceman's personality. We have studied the motivational-value component of stress resistance in military personnel of mechanized units using the methods of T. Ehlers, “Diagnostics of Motivation for Success,” K. Zamfir, as modified by A. Rean, “Motivation for Professional Activity,” and V. Osodlo, “Research on Professional Activity.” We have determined the degree of military personnel's orientation toward achieving success in defensive combat using T. Ehlers' methodology “Diagnostics of Motivation for Success” [1, pp. 89–92; 3, pp. 143–146]. The results of the study using this methodology are presented in Table 1
| Level of motivation | Officers | Sergeants | Soldiers | |||||||||
| combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | |||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| High | – | – | – | – | 2 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 |
| Moderately high | 2 | 17 | 4 | 33 | 22 | 39 | 4 | 7 | 42 | 26 | 34 | 21 |
| Average | – | 6 | 50 | 6 | 11 | 16 | 28 | 34 | 21 | 30 | 18 | |
| Low | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 1 |
Table 1: Levels of motivation for success among servicemen in mechanized units
Based on the quantitative data interpreted in Table 1, it is possible to predict the ability of servicemen of mechanized units to achieve success in defensive combat. Considering that 126 servicemen (54%) have “high” and “moderately high” motivation scores, the motivational orientation of this category of individuals is determined by stable attributes of their personality: loyalty to military duty, honesty, fairness, self-confidence, and confidence in their abilities and qualities. They are characterized by prudence, activity, determination, and persistence in achieving their goals. Excessive diligence and caution in making important decisions indicate a high level of responsibility for the results of their activities. At the time of the survey, “average indicators” of motivational orientation were observed in 92 servicemen (40%). Such servicemen have a situational motivational orientation that depends on external stimuli; they are less proactive and success-oriented. Servicemen with “low” scores, numbering only 14 people (6%), exhibited the following psychological characteristics: low self-esteem, dominance of external motives over internal ones, lack of confidence in themselves and their abilities, and discomfort due to the need to perform complex combat tasks. Interviews revealed that this category of military personnel had been on the battlefield for a long time (from 6 to 24 months). Under conditions of prolonged emotional and physiological stress, these servicemen lost faith in themselves, their strength, the meaning of being at war, and the prospects for its end. Using K. Zamfir's methodology, modified by A. Rean in “Motivation for Professional Activity,” we have identified the dominant motivational complexes characteristic of servicemen in mechanized units, the ratio of which is reflected in three types of motivation: internal motivation (IM), external positive motivation (EPM), and external negative motivation (ENM) [1, pp. 94–96]. The results of the statistical data are presented in Table 2.
| Motivational complex indicator | Officers | Sergeants | Soldiers | |||||||||
| combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | |||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
Optimal (IM > EPM > ENM) (IM = EPM > ENM) | – | – | 2 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 6 | 11 | 26 | 16 | 20 | 12 |
| Intermediate | 2 | 17 | 4 | 33 | 22 | 39 | 6 | 11 | 44 | 27 | 34 | 21 |
Not optimal (ENM > EPM > IM) | – | – | 4 | 33 | 10 | 18 | 4 | 7 | 18 | 11 | 22 | 13 |
Table 2: Indicators of motivation for professional activity in servicemen of mechanized units
As shown by the results interpreted in Table 2, the optimal motivational complex (IM > EPM > ENM; IM = EPM > ENM) is characteristic of 17% of officers, 25% of sergeants, and 28% of soldiers. This result indicates a high level of motivation among these categories of military personnel, their desire for self-development and self-improvement, their desire to achieve positive results and realize their potential through military and professional activities. At the same time, 33% of officers, 25% of sergeants, and 24% of soldiers have a negative motivational complex (ENM > EPM > IM), where external negative motivation (ENM) is reinforced. The desire to avoid criticism and condemnation from commanders prevails over life values. These results show that the activities of servicemen are motivated by external incentives (reward or avoidance of punishment). However, there is a category of military personnel who have intermediate motivational complexes (IM = EPM = ENM; IM = ENM > EPM; ENM > IM > EPM; EPM > IM > ENM; EPM > ENM > IM). The actions of such servicemen in defensive combat are determined by poly-motivation, caused by a number of motivational stimuli, each of which makes a certain contribution to the regulation of the servicemen's behavior. In our opinion, such motivational orientation is negative, since the actions and deeds of military personnel in combat conditions will be difficult to predict and correct. Using V. Osodlo's methodology “Research on Professional Motivation,” we have conducted a multidimensional analysis of professional motivation in conditions of defensive combat [1, pp. 81–89]. The relevant statistical data are presented in Table 3.
| Indicator | Officers | Sergeants | Soldiers | |||||||||
| combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | |||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| “Activity Results Evaluation” Scale | ||||||||||||
| Low | – | – | 8 | 66 | 26 | 46 | 8 | 14 | 42 | 26 | 42 | 26 |
| High | 2 | 17 | 2 | 17 | 14 | 26 | 8 | 14 | 46 | 28 | 34 | 20 |
| “Professional Aspirations” Scale | ||||||||||||
| Low | – | – | 4 | 33 | 6 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 22 | 13 | 2 | 1 |
| High | 2 | 17 | 6 | 50 | 34 | 61 | 12 | 21 | 66 | 41 | 74 | 45 |
| “Internality in the Sphere of Professional Achievements” Scale | ||||||||||||
| Low | – | – | 2 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 10 | 18 | 36 | 22 | 36 | 21 |
| High | 2 | 17 | 8 | 66 | 32 | 57 | 6 | 11 | 52 | 32 | 40 | 25 |
| “Professional Interests and Values” Scale | ||||||||||||
| Low | – | – | 4 | 33 | 26 | 46 | 10 | 18 | 58 | 36 | 38 | 23 |
| High | 2 | 17 | 6 | 50 | 14 | 25 | 6 | 11 | 30 | 18 | 38 | 23 |
| “Life Goals” Scale | ||||||||||||
| Low | – | – | 2 | 17 | 16 | 29 | 4 | 7 | 28 | 17 | 20 | 12 |
| High | 2 | 17 | 8 | 66 | 24 | 43 | 12 | 21 | 60 | 37 | 56 | 34 |
| “Social Desirability” Scale | ||||||||||||
| Low | – | – | 4 | 33 | 24 | 42 | 6 | 11 | 48 | 29 | 60 | 37 |
| High | 2 | 17 | 6 | 50 | 16 | 29 | 10 | 18 | 40 | 24 | 16 | 10 |
| Overall activity | ||||||||||||
| Low | – | – | – | – | 4 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 20 | 12 | 10 | 6 |
| High | 2 | 17 | 10 | 83 | 36 | 64 | 10 | 18 | 68 | 41 | 66 | 40 |
Table 3: Indicators of motivation for professional activity in servicemen of mechanized units
The survey results presented in Table 3 show that, according to this methodology, high scores dominate on the scales of “Professional Aspirations” (officers – 67%, sergeants – 82%, soldiers – 86%), “Internality in the Sphere of Professional Achievements” (officers – 83%, sergeants – 68%, soldiers – 57%), and “Life Goals” (officers – 83%, sergeants – 63%, soldiers – 71%). Such military personnel have clearly defined life plans and specific paths, methods, and objective and subjective resources necessary for their implementation. Servicemen are aware that the achievement of defense combat objectives depends not only on the quantity and quality of weapons and military equipment, but also on their own efforts and abilities. It is likely that such servicemen strive to improve the results of their activities and show persistence and determination in their actions, as indicated by the indicators on the “professional aspirations” scale. A slight predominance of low scores was found on the scales of “Activity Results Evaluation” (officers – 66%, sergeants – 60%, soldiers – 52%), “Professional Interests and Values” (sergeants – 64%, soldiers – 59%), and “Social Desirability” (sergeants – 53%, soldiers – 66%) scales, the majority of presented military personnel are servicemen with combat experience. The value-semantic sphere of this category of persons has undergone transformational changes under the influence of psychological factors of defensive combat. Feelings of frustration leave the tasks set before them unfulfilled and cause military personnel to lose interest in further combat operations. In particular, the indicators on the “Social Desirability” scale reflect the desire of military personnel to prove themselves and behave in accordance with the norms of their environment. This category of individuals may adhere to socially accepted values, even if they do not correspond to their beliefs. We have analyzed the cognitive-intellectual component of stress resistance of servicemen of mechanized units using R. Kettell's “Multifactor Personality Study” methodology [4, pp. 409–421]. In this methodology, the system of cognitive-intellectual abilities is represented by three independent factors: “Intelligence” (factor B); “Practicality – Developed Imagination” (factor M); “Conservatism – Radicalism” (factor Q1). The overall indicators of the cognitive-intellectual component of stress resistance among servicemen of mechanized units are within the average statistical norms. However, for a more detailed understanding of the development of cognitive-intellectual abilities, we have analyzed each of the factors separately (Table 4).
| Indicator | Officers | Sergeants | Soldiers | |||||||||
| combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | |||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Factor B “Intelligence” | ||||||||||||
| Low | 2 | 17 | 10 | 83 | 36 | 64 | 14 | 25 | 80 | 49 | 72 | 44 |
| High | – | – | – | – | 4 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
| Factor M “Practicality – Developed Imagination” | ||||||||||||
| Low | 2 | 17 | 6 | 50 | 26 | 46 | 12 | 21 | 52 | 32 | 52 | 32 |
| High | – | – | 4 | 33 | 14 | 26 | 4 | 7 | 36 | 21 | 24 | 15 |
| Factor Q1 “Conservatism – Radicalism” | ||||||||||||
| Low | 2 | 17 | 10 | 83 | 28 | 51 | 12 | 21 | 74 | 44 | 60 | 37 |
| High | – | – | – | – | 12 | 21 | 4 | 7 | 14 | 9 | 16 | 10 |
Table 4: Indicators of cognitive and intellectual abilities of servicemen in mechanized units
As we can see from Table 4, the scores for factor B, “Intelligence,” are quite low in all categories of military personnel (officers – 100%, sergeants – 79%, soldiers – 93%). Low intelligence scores indicate that it is difficult for servicemen to generate new ideas and seek non-standard solutions in defensive combat. Despite sudden changes in the situation, military personnel are likely to prefer stereotypical thinking and previously rehearsed actions. In addition, there is a significant predominance of low scores for the M factors “Practicality – Developed Imagination” (officers – 67%, sergeants – 67%, soldiers – 64%) and Q1 “Conservatism – Radicalism” (officers – 100%, sergeants – 72%, soldiers – 81%). Servicemen with such scores in defensive combat tend to use established decision-making methods. The concrete thinking of servicemen allows them to quickly solve combat tasks and achieve combat aims based on realism and composure. In addition, empirical analysis has shown that cognitive and intellectual abilities are more pronounced in military personnel who participated in combat operations. Probably due to the high intellectual load in combat, the strength and endurance of nervous processes to the effects of combat stress factors, such servicemen have developed skills of rapid analysis, information processing, situation assessment, and optimal decision-making in combat. From a psychological point of view, servicemen with such indicators are more stress-resistant, which is extremely important for activities in the conditions of defensive combat. It is possible that there is also a connection with the age of servicemen, who, thanks to their life and combat experience, adequately comprehend and assess the combat situation and their own resources and choose constructive strategies for behavior in combat. The emotional-volitional component of stress resistance is revealed through a system of stable mental processes and characteristics of military personnel in mechanized units focused on achieving a specific defensive combat objective. We investigated the ability of military personnel to regulate their emotions and behavior and focus on specific combat tasks using the methodology of A. Zverkov and E. Eidman, “Research on Volitional Self-Regulation” [1, pp. 107–111; 3, pp. 135–140]. The results of the study are presented in Table 5.
| Indicator | Officers | Sergeants | Soldiers | |||||||||
| combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | |||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| “Persistence” Scale | ||||||||||||
| Low | 2 | 17 | 4 | 33 | 18 | 33 | 8 | 14 | 48 | 29 | 46 | 28 |
| High | – | – | 6 | 50 | 22 | 39 | 8 | 14 | 40 | 24 | 30 | 19 |
| “Self-Control” Scale | ||||||||||||
| Low | 2 | 17 | 4 | 33 | 14 | 25 | 8 | 14 | 52 | 32 | 36 | 22 |
| High | – | – | 6 | 50 | 26 | 47 | 8 | 14 | 36 | 22 | 40 | 24 |
| General Scale | ||||||||||||
| Low | 2 | 17 | 4 | 33 | 14 | 25 | 8 | 14 | 46 | 28 | 34 | 20 |
| High | – | – | 6 | 50 | 26 | 47 | 8 | 14 | 42 | 26 | 42 | 26 |
Table 5: Indicators of volitional self-regulation in servicemen of mechanized units
Analysis of the results showed that most of the personnel of mechanized units (officers – 50%, sergeants – 61%, soldiers – 52%) are distinguished by high levels of emotional-volitional self-regulation, which indicates their emotional maturity, activity, independence, and self-reliance. The activities of this category of individuals in defensive combat are based on self-confidence, steadfastness of purpose, and a sense of responsibility for the results of their actions. In the event of a sudden change in the situation, servicemen will control their actions and distribute their efforts in accordance with the objectives and circumstances of the battle. High scores on the scales of “Persistence” and “Self-Control” indicate the activity and responsibility of military personnel. Volitional qualities such as self-control, determination and purposefulness are the core of volitional actions aimed at achieving a specific goal in defensive combat. However, low scores are also observed on these scales: “Persistence” (officers – 50%, sergeants – 47%, soldiers – 57%); “Self-Control” (officers – 50%, sergeants – 39%, soldiers – 54%). These results reflect the increased emotional lability of military personnel to the influence of external and internal factors of combat. Uncertainty and impulsiveness are manifested in the inconsistency of their actions in defensive combat. It is possible that the emotional-volitional sphere of servicemen in mechanized units has a dual cause: on the one hand, the conscious regulation of their actions by servicemen depends significantly on the properties of the nervous system, and on the other hand, on the acquired knowledge, skills, abilities, and combat experience [6, pp. 32–35]. Accordingly, the optimization and development of the emotional-volitional sphere of military personnel can be achieved through psychological training [5, pp. 27–28]. We have studied the current emotional state of servicemen in mechanized units using the methodology developed by A. Wessmann and D. Rix, “Research on Emotional State” [1, pp. 114–117]. The results of the study are presented in Table 6.
| Indicator | Officers | Sergeants | Soldiers | |||||||||
| combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | |||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Poor | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 4 | 18 | 11 | – | – |
| Deteriorated | 2 | 17 | 4 | 33 | 20 | 36 | 4 | 7 | 42 | 26 | 38 | 23 |
| Good | – | – | 6 | 50 | 14 | 25 | 8 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 36 | 22 |
| Very good | – | – | – | – | 6 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Table 6: Integral indicator of emotional state in servicemen of mechanized units
As can be seen from Table 6, there are no significant differences in the indicators between “poor,” “deteriorated” (officers – 50%; sergeants – 47%; soldiers – 60%) and “good,” “very good” (officers – 50%; sergeants – 53%; soldiers – 40%) are not observed. High indicators of emotional state characterize emotionally stable servicemen with sufficient psychological resources, capable of controlling their emotions in combat conditions. The presence of some servicemen with low emotional state indicators shows their emotional exhaustion. In our opinion, such indicators are the result of the prolonged impact of a number of negative combat factors on the psyche of military personnel, since the study was conducted immediately after the personnel returned from the area of operations. Excessive anxiety, low self-esteem, irritation, fear, and worry led to emotional discomfort in the emotional-volitional sphere of servicemen. As a result, the prolonged expression of such signs significantly affected the sensitivity threshold of military personnel to combat stressors. The indicators of the emotional-volitional component have been revealed through the indicators of situational anxiety, which are analyzed using the Spielberg-Khanin method “Study of Situational Anxiety” [1, pp. 341–343]. The corresponding results are presented in Table 7.
| Level of anxiety | Officers | Sergeants | Soldiers | |||||||||
| combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | |||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| High | – | – | 2 | 16 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | – | – |
| Moderate | – | – | 6 | 50 | 14 | 25 | 6 | 11 | 42 | 26 | 20 | 12 |
| Low | 2 | 17 | 2 | 17 | 22 | 39 | 8 | 14 | 44 | 27 | 56 | 34 |
| Very low | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Table 7: Indicators of situational anxiety levels in servicemen of mechanized units
The results of situational anxiety measurements showed high levels in 4% of personnel, moderate levels in 38%, and low levels in 58% (see Table 7). Low anxiety levels characterize emotionally stable, confident, and adaptable military personnel in rapidly changing situations. On a cognitive level, such military personnel perceive combat stressors as non-threatening. Servicemen with “moderate” and “high” levels of situational anxiety demonstrate excessive excitement and anxiety even in situations that do not pose a danger to them. In any case, high levels of anxiety prevent adequate perception of the situation and affect the adaptation process and behavior of military personnel in defensive combat. In addition, the vast majority of servicemen with elevated anxiety levels are combatants, and just the thought of returning to the combat zone and memories of traumatic events cause them increased anxiety. The behavioral component of stress resistance of servicemen of mechanized units to defensive combat has been revealed through behavioral strategies and individual personality traits of servicemen. This approach made it possible to comprehensively study the factors that directly influence the choice of behavioral strategies by servicemen in a combat situation. Using the methodology of S. Norman, D. Endler, D. James, and M. Parker, “Coping Behavior in Stressful Situations,” we have identified the dominant behavioral strategies of servicemen of mechanized units in defensive combat [2, pp. 173–175]. The results of the study using this methodology are presented in Table 8.
| Types of coping strategies | Officers | Sergeants | Soldiers | |||||||||
| combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | |||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Problem-oriented | 2 | 17 | 6 | 50 | 21 | 37 | 10 | 17 | 40 | 24 | 35 | 21 |
| Emotion-oriented | – | – | 2 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Avoidance strategy | – | – | 1 | 8 | 2 | 4 | – | – | 6 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| Distraction strategy | – | – | – | – | 6 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| Seeking social support | – | – | 1 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 12 | 19 | 12 |
Table 8: Indicators of coping behavior in servicemen of mechanized units
As can be seen from Table 8, the predominant strategy of behavior of servicemen of mechanized units in defensive combat is problem-oriented coping (officers – 67%; sergeants – 54%; soldiers – 43%). This behavior of servicemen is optimal and rational in combat, as it involves a consistent solution to the problem: analysis of the situation, planning, and active action. In fact, this reaction of the body is caused by a rational perception of the source of stress and the use of personal resources to weaken its impact on the serviceman's body. The next most frequently chosen strategy among military personnel is “seeking social support,” with 8% of officers, 20% of sergeants, and 24% of soldiers choosing this option. This trend in military personnel behavior indicates the effective use of social environment resources: family, friends, and comrades-in-arms. By choosing this strategy, servicemen seek to minimize the negative impact of combat stress through informational and emotional support, sympathy, advice, and attention from their social environment. The least represented strategies in the behavior of military personnel in defensive combat are the “emotionally oriented strategy,” the “avoidance strategy,” and the “distraction strategy.” The frequency with which they are chosen by military personnel is as follows: “emotion-oriented strategy” (officers – 17%; sergeants – 8%; soldiers – 9%), “avoidance strategy” (officers – 8%; sergeants – 4%; soldiers – 9%), “distraction strategy” (sergeants – 14%; soldiers – 13%). Such behavioral dynamics reflect the underdevelopment of psychological self-defense mechanisms in military personnel. When exposed to strong combat stressors (socio-psychological, combat, ecological-ergonomic), servicemen will exhibit maladaptive forms of behavior: complete or partial ignorance of the problem, passivity, aggression, confusion. Using V. Rybnikov's method “Research on the level of neuropsychiatric stability – Prognosis 2,” we identified individual signs of personality disorders and assessed the likelihood of neuropsychiatric breakdowns [1, pp. 325–331]. The results of the study using this method are presented in Table 9.
| Levels of neuropsychological stability | Officers | Sergeants | Soldiers | |||||||||
| combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | |||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| High | – | – | 2 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 26 | 16 | 44 | 27 |
| Average | – | – | 2 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 18 | 11 | 12 | 7 |
| Low | 2 | 17 | 6 | 50 | 28 | 56 | 4 | 8 | 44 | 27 | 20 | 12 |
Table 9: Indicators of the level of neuropsychological stability in servicemen of mechanized units
The survey results have showed that 16% of officers, 24% of sergeants, and 43% of soldiers had a high level of neuropsychological stability. This category of military personnel was less likely to experience neuropsychological breakdowns in combat. Servicemen with an average level of neuropsychological stability (officers – 17%, sergeants – 12%, soldiers – 18%) will demonstrate situational neuropsychological breakdowns depending on the intensity of combat operations. The majority of military personnel have a low level of nervous and mental stability: 67% of officers, 64% of sergeants, and 39% of soldiers. The vast majority of servicemen in this category are combatants. To determine the causes of low levels of neuropsychological stability, we have analyzed internal connections and decoded the factors that significantly influence the overall neuropsychological stability of servicemen. Positive correlations were found for the following indicators: feelings of helplessness (rxy = 0.348; p = 0.05); bouts of bad mood (rxy = 0.400; p = 0.05); nervous system overexcitement (rxy = 0.332; p = 0.05); apathy (rxy = 0.360, p = 0.05). The psychological content of such connections is characterized by a disruption of normal living conditions, activities, and rest. The constant and prolonged influence of psychotraumatic factors of combat leads to fatigue, nervous exhaustion, disruption of activities, and affective reactions. Using O. Kokun's methodology “Research of Psychophysiological State,” we have studied various components of the psychophysiological state of servicemen of mechanized units in the conditions of performing specific tasks [1, pp. 100–101]. The results of the study using this methodology are presented in Table 10.
| Indicators | Officers | Sergeants | Soldiers | |||||||||
| combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | combatant | non-combatant | |||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Low | – | – | 6 | 50 | – | – | 2 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Below average | 2 | 17 | – | – | 6 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 24 | 15 | 22 | 13 |
| Average | – | – | 2 | 17 | 14 | 25 | 4 | 7 | 32 | 19 | 24 | 15 |
| Above average | – | – | – | – | 12 | 21 | 4 | 7 | 14 | 10 | 22 | 13 |
| High | – | – | 2 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 2 |
Table 10: Indicators of the psychophysiological state in servicemen in mechanized units
presented in Table 10 show that in the vast majority of the studied servicemen of mechanized units, the indicators of psychophysiological state vary within the lower and upper average values. This dynamic can be explained by the individual characteristics of the servicemen (age, health, combat experience) and other factors that determine their activities (living conditions, team cohesion, family problems, sleep deprivation, fatigue, length of stay in the combat zone, etc.). Particular attention is drawn to the low levels of psychophysiological condition in 50% of officers who did not participate in combat operations. A more detailed analysis of the components of psychophysiological condition showed their low self-confidence and belief in their abilities. These results probably indicate that newly arrived officers lack the skills necessary to perform their duties. This category of individuals will need to work on self-improvement, as it will be extremely difficult for them to make important decisions and take responsibility.-
Thus, empirical analysis using pre-selected psychodiagnostic tools made it possible to establish that the ability of servicemen of mechanized units to adapt and act effectively in defensive combat depends on a number of characteristics determined by the internal nature of stress resistance. Using a set of methods, we have been able to objectively identify the factors that influence the process of adaptation of servicemen in defensive combat. The empirical data have been obtained outlined the specifics of progression of program for developing stress resistance of servicemen of mechanized units, the development of which will become the focus of further scientific research in this area.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. The peer review process of the journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions was excellent and fast, as was the support of the editorial office and the quality of the journal. Kind regards Walter F. Riesen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Walter F. Riesen.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. Thank you for publishing our article, Exploring Clozapine's Efficacy in Managing Aggression: A Multiple Single-Case Study in Forensic Psychiatry in the international journal of clinical case reports and reviews. We found the peer review process very professional and efficient. The comments were constructive, and the whole process was efficient. On behalf of the co-authors, I would like to thank you for publishing this article. With regards, Dr. Jelle R. Lettinga.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, I would like to express my deep admiration for the exceptional professionalism demonstrated by your journal. I am thoroughly impressed by the speed of the editorial process, the substantive and insightful reviews, and the meticulous preparation of the manuscript for publication. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the courteous and immediate responses from your editorial office to all my inquiries. Best Regards, Dariusz Ziora
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation, Auctores Publishing LLC, We would like to thank the editorial team for the smooth and high-quality communication leading up to the publication of our article in the Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. The reviewers have extensive knowledge in the field, and their relevant questions helped to add value to our publication. Kind regards, Dr. Ravi Shrivastava.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, Auctores Publishing LLC, USA Office: +1-(302)-520-2644. I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the efficient and professional handling of my case report by the ‘Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies’. The peer review process was not only fast but also highly constructive—the reviewers’ comments were clear, relevant, and greatly helped me improve the quality and clarity of my manuscript. I also received excellent support from the editorial office throughout the process. Communication was smooth and timely, and I felt well guided at every stage, from submission to publication. The overall quality and rigor of the journal are truly commendable. I am pleased to have published my work with Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, and I look forward to future opportunities for collaboration. Sincerely, Aline Tollet, UCLouvain.
Dear Ms. Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. “The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews represented the “ideal house” to share with the research community a first experience with the use of the Simeox device for speech rehabilitation. High scientific reputation and attractive website communication were first determinants for the selection of this Journal, and the following submission process exceeded expectations: fast but highly professional peer review, great support by the editorial office, elegant graphic layout. Exactly what a dynamic research team - also composed by allied professionals - needs!" From, Chiara Beccaluva, PT - Italy.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, we have deeply appreciated the professionalism demonstrated by the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The reviewers have extensive knowledge of our field and have been very efficient and fast in supporting the process. I am really looking forward to further collaboration. Thanks. Best regards, Dr. Claudio Ligresti
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. “The peer review process was efficient and constructive, and the editorial office provided excellent communication and support throughout. The journal ensures scientific rigor and high editorial standards, while also offering a smooth and timely publication process. We sincerely appreciate the work of the editorial team in facilitating the dissemination of innovative approaches such as the Bonori Method.” Best regards, Dr. Matteo Bonori.
I recommend without hesitation submitting relevant papers on medical decision making to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I am very grateful to the editorial staff. Maria Emerson was a pleasure to communicate with. The time from submission to publication was an extremely short 3 weeks. The editorial staff submitted the paper to three reviewers. Two of the reviewers commented positively on the value of publishing the paper. The editorial staff quickly recognized the third reviewer’s comments as an unjust attempt to reject the paper. I revised the paper as recommended by the first two reviewers.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Thank you for publishing our case report: "Clinical Case of Effective Fetal Stem Cells Treatment in a Patient with Autism Spectrum Disorder" within the "Journal of Clinical Research and Reports" being submitted by the team of EmCell doctors from Kyiv, Ukraine. We much appreciate a professional and transparent peer-review process from Auctores. All research Doctors are so grateful to your Editorial Office and Auctores Publishing support! I amiably wish our article publication maintained a top quality of your International Scientific Journal. My best wishes for a prosperity of the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Hope our scientific relationship and cooperation will remain long lasting. Thank you very much indeed. Kind regards, Dr. Andriy Sinelnyk Cell Therapy Center EmCell
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. It was truly a rewarding experience to work with the journal “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. The peer review process was insightful and encouraging, helping us refine our work to a higher standard. The editorial office offered exceptional support with prompt and thoughtful communication. I highly value the journal’s role in promoting scientific advancement and am honored to be part of it. Best regards, Meng-Jou Lee, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital.
Dear Editorial Team, Journal-Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, “Publishing my article with Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions has been a highly positive experience. The peer-review process was rigorous yet supportive, offering valuable feedback that strengthened my work. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional professionalism, prompt communication, and a genuine commitment to maintaining the highest scientific standards. I am very pleased with the publication quality and proud to be associated with such a reputable journal.” Warm regards, Dr. Mahmoud Kamal Moustafa Ahmed
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews’, I appreciate the opportunity to publish my article with your journal. The editorial office provided clear communication during the submission and review process, and I found the overall experience professional and constructive. Best regards, Elena Salvatore.
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews Herewith I confirm an optimal peer review process and a great support of the editorial office of the present journal
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. I am really grateful for the peers review; their feedback gave me the opportunity to reflect on the message and impact of my work and to ameliorate the article. The editors did a great job in addition by encouraging me to continue with the process of publishing.
Dear Cecilia Lilly, Editorial Coordinator, Endocrinology and Disorders, Thank you so much for your quick response regarding reviewing and all process till publishing our manuscript entitled: Prevalence of Pre-Diabetes and its Associated Risk Factors Among Nile College Students, Sudan. Best regards, Dr Mamoun Magzoub.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is a high quality journal that has a clear and concise submission process. The peer review process was comprehensive and constructive. Support from the editorial office was excellent, since the administrative staff were responsive. The journal provides a fast and timely publication timeline.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, What distinguishes International Journal of Clinical Case Report and Review is not only the scientific rigor of its publications, but the intellectual climate in which research is evaluated. The submission process is refreshingly free of unnecessary formal barriers and bureaucratic rituals that often complicate academic publishing without adding real value. The peer-review system is demanding yet constructive, guided by genuine scientific dialogue rather than hierarchical or authoritarian attitudes. Reviewers act as collaborators in improving the manuscript, not as gatekeepers imposing arbitrary standards. This journal offers a rare balance: high methodological standards combined with a respectful, transparent, and supportive editorial approach. In an era where publishing can feel more burdensome than research itself, this platform restores the original purpose of peer review — to refine ideas, not to obstruct them Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi, FCCP PULMONOLOGIST AND THORACIC IMAGING.
Dear Grace Pierce, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews I appreciate the opportunity to review for Auctore Journal, as the overall editorial process was smooth, transparent and professionally managed. This journal maintains high scientific standards and ensures timely communications with authors, which is truly commendable. I would like to express my special thanks to editor Grace Pierce for his constant guidance, promt responses, and supportive coordination throughout the review process. I am also greatful to Eleanor Bailey from the finance department for her clear communication and efficient handling of all administrative matters. Overall, my experience with Auctore Journal has been highly positive and rewarding. Best regards, Sabita sinha
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of the journal IJCCR, I write here a little on my experience as an author submitting to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews (IJCCR). This was my first submission to IJCCR and my manuscript was inherently an outsider’s effort. It attempted to broadly identify and then make some sense of life’s under-appreciated mysteries. I initially had responded to a request for possible submissions. I then contacted IJCCR with a tentative topic for a manuscript. They quickly got back with an approval for the submission, but with a particular requirement that it be medically relevant. I then put together a manuscript and submitted it. After the usual back-and-forth over forms and formality, the manuscript was sent off for reviews. Within 2 weeks I got back 4 reviews which were both helpful and also surprising. Surprising in that the topic was somewhat foreign to medical literature. My subsequent updates in response to the reviewer comments went smoothly and in short order I had a series of proofs to evaluate. All in all, the whole publication process seemed outstanding. It was both helpful in terms of the paper’s content and also in terms of its efficient and friendly communications. Thank you all very much. Sincerely, Ted Christopher, Rochester, NY.
